Taking issue with Phil Trubey’s legal interpretation

Home Forums Click Here For RSF Post Member Forum Taking issue with Phil Trubey’s legal interpretation

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #9045
      Almost30
      Participant

      It is always dangerous when non-legal people start quoting the law. They rarely get it right and Phil Trubey is no exception. Mr. Trubey would have you believe that the Board of Directors does not owe a fiduciary duty to its members. That is, quite simply, wrong. The California Courts, in recognition of the increasingly important role played by private homeowner’s associations, have
      imposed a fiduciary duty owed by such associations to their members. See ⎁Cohen v. Kite Hill Community Assn. (1983) 142 Cal.App.3d 642.

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.