Doesn’t smell like Rowe-ses

[jenglish]

Well said, this was terrible form by Ms. Ross, and the Post collectively. Another classic example of a board attempting to “shape the public narrative” rather than providing necessary answers to those they were elected to serve. I look forward to a thorough explanation by the Rowe board to explain the rationale behind this poor choice. Rowe will now be lucky to receive an applicant with even half of the qualifications and expertise Dr. Bennett provided to this district. Perhaps in the future it would be wise for the board to focus more on properly serving those in your district, and less on poorly attempted political maneuvers, and empty “leadership” talking points. The district deserves answers.

[GinAndTonic]

Regardless of whether or not Rowe’s School Board President was “Right” in accepting Dr. Bennett’s resignation, her authorization of an exclusive interview with the Post before notifying the parents and students is completely shameful and extremely bad form.  Some may argue that at least a notification email was sent to parents, but it was clearly circulated after the RSF Post’s email about their exclusive interview (sent at 12:19p) with Ms. Ross.  Shouldn’t the affected stakeholders first have an opportunity to speak with Ms. Ross a special board session to understand the rationale?  This action reeks of self-serving hubris, and all of her answers in the Post piece on leadership are completely hollow.  Why should anyone of substance apply or even accept the Rowe Superintendent job?

[Author]

Posts