“Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics” – Part II

[alden.lucas]

That means that as many as 697 members might want the investigation into the PPP loan to continue. That’s likely not the possible result that JW would want us to focus on from the survey.

[noah.santos]

Again, thank you for joining the conversation.

[ptrubey]

Obviously I, Phil Trubey, am not “JW”, aka “Truth in the Ranch” or whatever it is called. I have no idea who that person is either.

[Rachel Laffer]

Dear Transparent RSF,

Thank you for your participation in the RSF Post Forum. We strive to make sure every voice is heard, which is why Forum contributions do NOT require editorial approval before posting.

The RSF Post made an executive decision to consolidate member input in one location, the Forum, so all readers could discuss published articles or any topic pertinent to Rancho Santa Fe in one easily accessible place. If your comment was made underneath a posted article, it may have been inadvertently lost when all member commentary was transitioned to the Forum. We apologize.

Again, thank you for joining the conversation.

Rachel Laffer, RSF Post Editor

 

 

[Bill Strong]

How come there have been no Emails signed by Director Trubey since May 10th, when he wrote:  “If you want a dysfunctional Board with stressed employees, vote somebody like Clotfelter in”.   What is that RSFA Director  afraid of ?

But since then the too obvious “JW” has been sending emails from a building in El Segundo almost ten times since May 10th, possibly to avoid “spam email” Laws.   There have been no emails signed by Trubey since.   Hmm.  Members need facts and information, not propaganda.

Should members of the Board with Fiduciary duties participate in selecting fellow Board members ?  Or is that best left to the Voters?

Just Wondering,

— StrongBill

[Transparent RSF]

Here’s the deal… We shouldn’t put any stock in whatever is being published in the RSF Post as it is SO BIASED it is insane.

While the editorial staff clearly stated in their: RSF Post: A Star Is Reborn

I will continue to be dedicated to encouraging wider community input and open dialogue from all corners

It also stated:

As a precaution, the Post is to be a proper group effort. Our online “kibbutz” has established an Editorial Board consisting of Ranch residents who will chip in, put a check on my balance, and ultimately better reflect RSF demographics and perspectives. 

Guess what… if you are not “on the list” you don’t get a voice. Attempting to address some of the misguided statements in the many recent articles, as suggested by the Editorial Staff I tried to make my voice heard through a forum post. The post had to be “reviewed”, wasn’t published, no explanation was given and thus my voice was being silenced.

The RSF Post should be taken down!

• This reply was modified 2 years, 1 month ago by Transparent RSF.

[Author]

Posts