It didn’t take long after easily surviving the recall election for Governor Newsom to sign controversial bills SB9 and SB10. Funny how our press didn’t raise a peep about this before the recall election.
SB10 – Probably Not A Concern
SB10 allows a city or county to pass a local zoning ordinance which allows 10 residential units per legal parcel. However, only “if the parcel is located in a transit-rich area or an urban infill site”. So this law probably doesn’t affect Rancho Santa Fe.
SB9 – Two Dwellings Per Lot + Lot Splits
SB9 allows for the construction of two dwelling units per legal lot. It also allows lots to be split, regardless of local zoning requirements. This backgrounder shows how up to eight dwellings units could be created per existing lot, but my read of the statute says the maximum would be four units per existing property. Either way, it would be bad news for Rancho Santa Fe.
The only exception to SB9 is if the property is “located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.”
As Holly Manion stated in a recent article, all or part of the Covenant (I’m trying to figure out which) has already been listed as a California State Historic Landmark (#982) in 1989, and a Cultural Landscape Amendment in 2004.
Bill Weber, RSF Association president, told me he is trying to get definitive word on the applicability of SB9 to Rancho, and untangle these state historical designations to see if we are exempt.